I recently wrote about how organizational change management is dead. The premise of this article is that traditional change efforts, frameworks, and approaches fail time and time again, so something needs to change if we are going to be more effective at managing change.
These failed change efforts are creating a vicious circle of continuous neglect of the people side of the digital transformation equation. Despite plenty of evidence and experience to the contrary, too many organizations fail to: a) recognize the importance of change management, and b) understand how exactly organizational change management should look on an SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, or other digital transformation initiative.
As a 20-year industry veteran that began as a Big 5 SAP organizational change management consultant, I have seen plenty of reasons why so many companies resist or misunderstand the need for change management. These reasons haven’t changed a whole lot over the years.
For example, here are just a few reasons why change management gets a bad rap:
This last one is the one that I have been digging deeper into as I have tried to dissect and understand things like SAP failures, Microsoft Dynamics 365 expert witness engagements, and every other digital transformation challenge under the sun.
Too many organizational change consultants put themselves into a change management box and don’t know how to effectively relate to the other components of digital transformation. They simply get their PROSCI certification, manage activities around “communications,” “awareness,” and other nebulous things, but fail to integrate change into the organization.
Worse yet, these change consultants fail to understand business operations, supply chains, industry trends, company strategies, and other components of integrated change. Organizational change consultants can’t be effective if all they do is put together some training, a few newsletters, and wipe their hands clean of overall accountability for the overarching transformation. Unfortunately, this is how I have seen too many change consultants operate.
Maybe “trojan horse” is a strong term, but change management needs to be embedded in the DNA of the overall transformation – not a standalone workstream with a standalone team. To be sure, you want resources to focus on these efforts and they should be deploying a comprehensive organizational change strategy, but they should not be on their own island.
Instead, these team members should be part of the team. They should roll up their sleeves to understand and improve business operations. They should understand the intersection of process and technology as well – not just people. Most importantly, they should help embed a structured organizational change mentality into the DNA of the client organization.
These people are hard to find, but they exist. They may be a small subset of the change management population, but they are some of the most effective change consultants that I have worked with. Not coincidentally, I have either hired or attempted to hire these types of consultants on to the Third Stage team.
The bottom line? Treat organizational change as a siloed part of your transformation workstream, and it will eventually become detached (or intentionally cut) from the overall initiative. Embed it into the fabric of your project and team, on the other hand, and it will become a natural way of doing business with greater long-term success.